RSS
 

Archive for the ‘Church’ Category

Why I Don’t Preach the Law

25 Jan

A man recently asked me why I did not preach more about sins and their consequences. Why, for example, did I not talk more about what he called “obvious” sins, and about how they would bring pain and punishment.

Now, perhaps this is an area where I need to be challenged. It is possible that I am reacting to the absurd preaching I heard in my youth, that centered on long hair on men, pants on women, and other evils such as movies, rock music, and mixed bathing (they meant swimming with both genders).

But then again, I am not so sure that my list of “obvious” sins would look the same as my questioner’s.  As I have grown, it seems to me that sins of the mind and heart (pride, resentment, lack of love) are much more deadly than the sins of the flesh.  But there is a deeper reason that, though I will talk of sin, I will not make it the focus of my preaching. And that reason has nothing to do with the reason of some churches today (that talking of sin is unpopular and does not help reaching out to the lost).

I don’t focus on law (hereby defined as an focus on getting people to sin less, with emphasis on pain and punishment for disobedience) for the following reason: It can never make a person godly. Never. Not in a million years, not if I was the best preacher on the planet.

The reason, I think, is not hard to see. Think of the reasons a person motivated by law (or any other external force) has for any moral reform they might perform:

  • The avoidance of punishment or discipline
  • The avoidance of the natural consequences of sin
  • A desire to enjoy life without guilt
  • A desire for a good reputation
  • A desire to live up to a certain view of themselves
  • A desire for their life to “work” better.

    Now, except for the third item, none of these are BAD reasons. In fact, they are wise, in one sense of the term anyway. We can’t go against the grain of the universe without getting splinters.  But in the end, they still leave this person helplessly locked up in self.  They do not change the person’s heart; they confirm and deepen the heart’s pride and self-focus.

    The better way is marked out by the Apostle Paul in Romans 2:4 and 12:1, where he points out that it is the kindness of God that leads to repentance, and that we should seek to honor God because of His mercy.  It is when my heart, ravished and overwhelmed with God’s kindness and love for me, desires to follow God in order to please Him that I grow more into what God wants me to be. And that, if it comes at all, comes only by preaching the grace of God over the pain of sin.

    The Lutheran theologian Walther gets it just right:

    An enforcer of laws, like a jailer, is not concerned about the condition of the heart of the person with whom he must deal, but only about enforcing that person’s obedience. He stands before his victim with a scourge and tells him that the scourge will come down on his back if he does not obey. The jailer is not concerned about godly motives among his prisoners. The prisoners, on the other hand, while they are fast in stocks and in their cells and are forced to obey, are revolving plans in their minds how to avoid being caught at their next theft. That is what a preacher of the law does to the members of a Christian congregation: he puts them in stocks and fetters them.

    Let no minister think that he cannot induce the unwilling to do God’s will by preaching the Gospel to them and that he must rather preach the Law and proclaim the threatenings of God to them. If that is all he can do, he will only lead his people to perdition.

     

    The First Church Service I Ever Walked out of

    16 Dec

    I’m not much of a protester.  Too easy going and all that.  I did walk out of a movie once, but it was so long ago I forget why.

    I have certainly never walked out of a church service in anger. Until this month.  Two weeks ago I walked out during the middle of the pastor’s “sermon”. Here is why.

    The church in question is Living Word Bible Church, in Mesa, Arizona.  I was staying with my elderly mother for a week, and she lives a couple miles from the church.  She goes to a different church, but that morning (long story) I did not go with her.  I really did desire to go to church, however, especially since it was the second Sunday of advent. But since I had no car with me, this meant a good Sunday morning walk.  I picked out two likely candidates on my phone’s web browser, then headed off to one of them. I soon realized I would not get there in time, so I detoured and walked to Living Word Bible Church instead.  I knew little about it, but I figured since they had both “word” and “bible” in their name that they would at least try to be a teaching church (unfortunately, by this logic Grapenuts would have both grape and nuts).

    I made my way in from a side street, and the first thing I noticed was that the congregation was very racially diverse.  Score one for them.  I was quite disconcerted, however, at the name of the bookstore which dominated one corner of the massive foyer: “Winner’s Bookstore”.  Major red flag.  The most common heresy of the modern American church is the idea that God’s design in salvation is to make us successful in earthly categories like success and wealth.  Ever an optimist, I hoped this was an aberration, and made my way into the sanctuary.

    The service began with the pastor of the church, one C. Thomas Anderson, announcing that this was going to be a special miracle service.  Okaaaayyyy.  To me, the idea of “planning” miracles is as ludicrous as “planning” revivals.  But I had walked two miles to be in church and worship, and was not going to leave.  Or so I thought.

    The band then belted out three songs.  Though all three had words on the screens, I don’t think the first two were really intended to be congregationally sung. They were too fast and the timing too odd to work as corporate worship songs. In any case, neither was about God at all. The first asked the question, “Are you ready?” and answered it with the repeated refrain, “I’m as ready as can be”.  The second was about me living a miraculous, blessed life.  Both songs basically functioned like the music of pep rally, and indeed the whole service brought back to mind the forced enthusiasm of my high school assemblies before the big game.  The third song was actually quite good (or maybe my expectations were so low that any song actually about Jesus would strike a cord).  I hadn’t heard it before, but it was about Jesus meeting my needs.  Yes, even though it was a Jesus song, it was exalting him primarily for how he helps me in this life (which I don’t find a bad thing as long as it is balanced by more objective worship songs).

    The pastor comes back on stage.  He begins talking about how the church needs to get out of debt.  I notice before the service they showed a video about planning for a new building “three times the size of our present one, with ten thousand seats”, so apparently the goal is to get out of debt so we can get back in debt. This especially struck me as odd, since the service (one of three that morning) was less than 40 percent full.

    Pastor Anderson then launches into several minutes describing the greatness of the church and its strategic place (somehow Mesa is the epicenter of the country).  At this point I am a little distressed.  More than twenty minutes into the service, and I have heard almost nothing about Jesus or even God, but a good deal about the church and the pastor.

    The Pastor transitions to talking about how much greater the church could be if it was out of debt. I look again at the pledge sheets handed out before the service.  He tells us that they will create a permanent landscape on one of the walls. If you give a certain amount, you will get a place on the landscape. 250 bucks will buy you a bronze tulip with your name, while $250,000 will place you on a silver eagle in the sky, and for only a million dollars you get a piece of the rainbow.  Pastor Anderson takes pains to point out how your children and grandchildren (and, of course, everyone else) will always be able to see how much you gave. I couldn’t help wondering about the words of Jesus regarding giving: “don’t let your right hand know what you are doing, so that your giving may be in secret” (Matthew 6:3-4).

    This transitions into Pastor Anderson holding his wife and himself up as examples.  Three times, we are told, they agreed to give God “everything”.  And of course God rewarded them for this.  “God gave us a mansion. If you have ever been to my house, you know it is a mansion. And God gave it to us at cost”.  This was spoken so arrogantly that I began to feel queasy.  He goes on, “And you should see all my cars!”

    And here, I could take it no longer.  It was well past the half-way part of the service, and it was apparent there would be no bible teaching.  The cross of Christ had not been mentioned one time, nor had Jesus himself been mentioned except almost in passing.  I will claim no great gift of discernment, but I was pretty sure any “miracles” generated in this man-glorifying pep rally were not going to be from the Holy Spirit.

    I walked out.  I wept for a minute outside, then began the walk home.

     

    Five Preachers I have a Man-crush on

    13 May

    Sometimes I greatly envy the preachers of old, who did not have parishioners comparing themselves to some exceptionally gifted preacher in another part of the country (because the never heard that gifted preacher).  These days it seems some people want their local Pastor to preach like Swindoll, lead like Hybels, and look like Osteen (and still visit them in the hospital).

    The flip side of this issue, though, is that today we do have an opportunity that all previous generations could only dream of: to listen to God’s Word preached and taught through a great variety of gifted men and women.  The internet has opened the floodgates; there are some AMAZING Bible teachers out there.

    What a gift this is.  Some people are in a church where solid Bible teaching is rare, yet they do not feel they should leave.  There are ways now to supplement that diet.  But even a good local preacher will have his own shortcomings, biases, and slant. Often it is good to listen to another trained person’s take on things.

    Anyway, here are my favorite modern preachers (that have free sermons available, anyway). These men are incredibly gifted by God, and their words almost always are used by God in my life when I listen to them.

    John Piper  is the best pastor-as-theologian I know.  He wears his learning lightly, but it is there, like the foundation of a sky-scraper.  What draws the ear, though, is the passion.  Passion for God and for His glory.  No one is better at shaking me out of my spiritual doldrums, and this not by hectoring, but by an unceasing exaltation of God and His ways. Piper is the Pastor at Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis, and someone at that church has given the kingdom a great gift in uploading seemingly everything Piper has taught in the last 30 years.  You will find the treasury here.

    D.A. Carson  is not a pastor, but Research Professor of New Testament at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School.  He is my favorite New Testament scholar, and I snatch up any commentary he writes.  His understanding of the message of John, especially, seems to me to be almost beyond compare.  But Dr. Carson has a pastor’s heart, and you can often find him preaching or teaching at churches or conferences.  Many of these are collected at the wonderful site of the Gospel Coalition (which thankfully allows you to search their huge database by speaker as well as text).

    Tim Keller is the Pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in Manhattan, and the author of several books.  I heard him at a Pastor’s conference a few years back, and was greatly helped (and impressed).  His approach is somewhat cerebral, but in very plain language, and very challenging spiritually.  You can find his sermons here.

    CJ Mahaney leads Sovereign Grace Mnistry.  It is almost impossible to dislike C.J. His engaging style and insightful thinking leave me shaking my head, saying: “I would be jealous of the guy, but I like him too much”.  I occasionally find myself disagreeing with a point or two he makes, but he always expands my thinking.  You can find a cache of his teaching here.

    Peter Kreeft is not a preacher, but a professor of philosophy at Boston College.  Nonetheless, his lectures have moved me spiritually as much as they have challenged my mind.  Kreeft is an amazing thinker, and one of the few great thinkers who can also communicate with regular audience.  His expositions of Tolkien and C.S. Lewis are masterful.  Kreeft is a Roman Catholic, so occasionally he will defend Catholic teaching, and (perhaps because of my own bias) this seems weaker than the rest of what he says.  But when he deals with the great themes of love, goodness, truth, beauty, evil, and such, he is without peer.  I often find myself listening to the same lecture many times. You will find a boatload of free lectures here.

    Finally, the Maclaurin Institute has some wonderful lectures of interest to thoughtful Christians. 

    So there you go friends.  I find the best way to listen to these is by downloading them and recording them on a cd that I will listen to while I am driving.  Even better than NPR. 

    Let me conclude with a few personal favorite sermons or lectures from the men above:

    The Father loves the Son (Carson; ignore the intro)

    10 Uncommon Insights about Evil from The Lord of the Rings (Kreeft)

    A Biblical Understanding of Sleep (Mahaney)

    The Good, the True, and the Beautiful (Kreeft)

     
    2 Comments

    Posted in Church

     

    The Ancient/Future Path

    27 Aug

    I don’t have much time online, which is why I don’t post here everyday.  One website, though, that I consistently make time for is, Internet Monk.  The writing is excellent, the comments (usually) constructive, and the topics are almost always relevant to someone trying to figure out what it means to be a Christian in 21st century America.

     Chaplain Mike today posted an excellent summary of a movement called Ancient/Future Christianity.  I would recommend it to you because it is the finest summary of what the movement is (and isn’t) that I have seen, and shows why this movement is gaining steam among many evangelicals.  You are welcome to post comments there, but I also would not mind getting your take here on the article.

     
    No Comments

    Posted in Church

     

    Goofiness and Glory

    24 Aug

    Okay, before we go any further, I found today a song I think is very beautiful, and would ask you to listen to it.

    Now, some may find the strings section a little sappy, but I love this song.  I love its simplicity, I love the biblical allusions, I even like the way it is sung, with just the right amount of emotion (btw, the audio quality is much better if you download the song on itunes).  In short, the composer has found a way to take a teaching of Jesus (about the narrow and wide roads) and not only turn it into beautiful music, but also a song in which the music gives space to the right response we should have as we contemplate the words of Jesus. Full props. 

    Now, here is the kicker.  This song is by a certain Rick Pino, who is featured in a much less positive light on this blog, under the heading, “If I become an atheist, here is Reason Number 3”.  In that video, Rick asks the audience to spin their socks over their heads as they sing, “you spin me right round, Jesus, right round”.  In my comments, I castigated this song for completely divorcing emotions from content, and for the fact that the only thing it says about Jesus is both silly and devoid of any objective meaning.  Aaaaaand, I still feel that way.

    But a reader invited me to listen to some of Rick’s other songs,  which I did.  I’ve only listened to a few so far, and they range from “not bad” to “wow”.  The song in today’s post is one I can imagine listening to quite often, or even using as part of a worship service. 

    So, on the one hand, we have a worship leader and artist who can make what I think is an absolute sham of a song, and on the other hand also puts out some wonderful and meaningful music.  A mixture of silliness and sagacity, goofiness and glory.  Hmmm…sounds a lot like me on my best days.  Sounds to me like a lot of us.  Sometimes the treasure inside the clay pot is glimpsed; sometimes all you see is the dust. 

    That’s why, despite sometimes getting annoyed with the church, I still love it deeply, and cast my lot with it.  Yes, it’s not perfect.  Yes, sometimes it seems we get it all wrong.  But sometimes we are reminded by the gifts of another of the beauty and meaning of walking together on the narrow road. 

    This doesn’t mean we can’t call each other out; but it does mean we also give thanks to God, and credit to people, when the glory shines through.

    Rick Pino, well done!

     
    4 Comments

    Posted in Church

     

    The Small god of Modern Evangelicalism

    20 Aug

    Yes, the non-capitalization of the third word in the title is deliberate.  I don’t think the god I am talked about deserves to be capitalized.  For I am not talking about the God of the scriptures, but the god that is worshipped in much of modern American evangelicalism.

    This god is good, but small and not very powerful.  This god is not able to use the foolish, weak and lowly things of this world to shame and nullify the wise, strong, and powerful ((see I Corinthians 1:26-31).  That is why those who lead this god’s churches must attempt to change the foolish things into things wise in the ways of this world, and must change the lowly and despised things into things this world likes and respects. 

    This god and his message must be made appealing to the world, much like Mary Poppins made the medicine more palatable by a spoon full of sugar.  The sweeteners  of coolness, relevance and freshness coat the message of this god, while those doing the coating tell us it doesn’t change the fundamental recipe.  Perhaps not, but the very fact that the sweeteners are added betray a lack of faith in the inherent power of the message, and the power of the god who gives it.

    It is not that the followers of this small god don’t believe the message; they just don’t believe it has much power without their help.  It’s not that they want to distort this message.  It’s just that the don’t reflect on how its distortion flows naturally from the help they give it.

    This is why we see increasingly that not only do many of the leaders have a small god, but so do the people in their churches.  These are people who view god as some sort of personal life-enhancement, not the author and judge of their life. They obey his commands selectively, and feel free to ignore or re-interpret those that might cause too much change, or that conflict too fiercely with the spirit of the age.  They view his church not as something they are deeply privileged to be a part of, but something they consume like any other form of entertainment, and that had better keep the goods coming. 

    This leads to the following scenario, in which I will ask the reader to see past the exaggerations and ask if it does not reflect reality somewhat.

    The pastor of [insert trendy name here] Church heads into his office Monday morning.  His first action is to check the numbers: attendance, giving, google rank.  He soon begins to think of this week’s sermon and worship (or, if well organized, those of the weeks ahead).  He has 7 hours for that this week (it used to be 15, but that was before he took on more ceo type responsibilities).  How does he spend those 7 hours?  The options are basically these: exegesis, prayer, presentation, and practice.  Since his main concern (though he would never admit it) is to impress or at least interest the hearers, so that they feel good enough about the message that they continue to come (and hopefully invite friends), he ends up spending most of the seven hours on the last two.  After all, not many will notice and fewer will care if he doesn’t get the meaning of the passage exactly right.  But everyone will notice and care if he is not interesting or relevant to the felt needs of the audience. 

    In similar way, the worship leader, taking his cue from the pastor, chooses songs based on the criteria of what the people will find enjoyable or “meaningful”.  Of course, he would never choose songs that are not scriptural.  But that leaves a lot of leeway.  He may try to coordinate the songs with the sermon and the other parts of the service.  But he will not spend a significant percentage of his time in prayer, nor will the focus of that prayer be seeking wisdom for how God would be pleased in the worship.

    The parishioners do their job on Sunday: they attend.  They are happy that their kids enjoy the music, and that the sermon is not too long.  The church is full, and seems to have energy, which further boosts their self-esteem for having chosen to be a part of such an excellent church. The message focuses on how God can improve their marriage, and they leave glad that God wants to help them.  As one wife would say later in the week, “I just love God! He does so much for me.”

    Is it even possible that the children of this church will ever view god as something more than a cosmic vending machine? 

    This is the morass into which we have sunk.

     

    Mega-Church worship spoof

    18 Aug

    Who says today’s big, cool churches don’t value liturgy?  It’s just a cooler  kind of liturgy!

     
    10 Comments

    Posted in Church, Humor

     

    Additional Verses for “Draw Me Close”

    17 Aug

    Draw me Close by Kelly Carpenter is one of those worship songs that is sometimes criticized for not having a lot of theological weight.  Personally, I tend to like its simplicity when used in the right way (surrounded by other, more theological songs, or as part of response to a sermon).

    While preaching through the book of Ephesians a few years ago, I wanted to write a song that summarized what God was saying about His plan and our place in it.  But I am no musician, so had to settle to adding two additional verses to this song, Draw Me Close.

    The first verse I added is about the image of the Church being a spiritual temple, being built to show God’s glory and beauty, and is based on Ephesians 2:19-22 (see also I Peter 2:4-8).  The second verse is about the Church as the Body of Christ, the way that He now chooses to manifest Himself in the world, and is based on Ephesians 4:11-16.  In both of these, I was attempting to show our place as individuals in something far greater than our individual selves.

    Anyway, here is how we ended up singing it in Church (and still do sometimes):

    Draw me close to you
    Never let me go
    I lay it all down again

    To hear you say that I’m your friend
    You are my desire
    No one else will do
    Cause nothing else can take your place
    To feel the warmth of your embrace
    Help me find the way
    Bring me back to you

    You’re all I want
    You’re all I’ve ever needed
    You’re all I want
    Help me know you are near

    In Your Temple, Lord
    I have found my place:
    A piece of glass you’ve stained and shaped
    In a picture-window of Your grace.
    As all the pieces shine
    Each their different hue
    Then all the world will stand in awe
    At the beauty of the plan of God.
    So help me find a way
    To let your light shine through!

    You’re all I want
    You’re all I’ve ever needed
    You’re all I want
    Help me know you are near

    And in Your body, Lord
    My purpose now I see
    To carry on Your perfect plan
    And show the love of God to man
    Touch others with my hands
    Love others with my heart
    Let my lips speak Your grace
    My arms form Your warm embrace
    Help me find the way
    To play my holy part!

    You’re all I want
    You’re all I’ve ever needed
    You’re all I want
    Help me know you are near

     
    5 Comments

    Posted in Church, Poetry

     

    The Purpose of the Church

    11 Aug

    Over at fccplace I have posted a new Bible study on the purpose of the Church.  This is something I have wrestled with over the last few years.  I did not give it a lot of thought before I became a Senior Pastor, and when I began studying, I found that people’s answers were all over the place.  Part of the confusion stems from people not distinguishing the roles of individual Christians as the church from the church as a local congregation.  After studying the book of Ephesians, I think I now have some clarity.

     

    Loving the Church, laughing at the Church

    10 Aug

    If you know me, you know that I love the Church. Not just the big, universal, amorphous Church, or the Church as a concept, but even the little group of people that meet weekly to sing, give, listen to preaching, pray, and fellowship together.  The older I have gotten, the more in love I have fallen with the Church.  The Church exemplifies the “weak” and “lowly” and even “foolish” things that God uses for strong, mighty and wise purposes (See I Corinthians 1:26-31).

    The question may come up, then, why I post things here pointing out what I DON’T like about the Church (see post below).  Is this, it may be asked, an act of love?

    I think so.  It seems to me that someone can point out foolishness in the Church either to mock it and discredit it, or to help the Church laugh at its own excesses, so that it can do better.  My goal is the second.  I have no desire to be mean, but I think we should be able both to laugh at ourselves as Christians, and also hold each other accountable for the foolishness will make the Church we love a laughingstock to outsiders.

    Anyway, if you feel I’m getting unbalanced, please let me know.

     
    2 Comments

    Posted in Church

     

    If I become an Athiest, here is reason number 3

    10 Aug

    Seriously, what are we thinking here?????

     
    8 Comments

    Posted in Church, Humor

     

    Top Ten Signs The Church Sound Guy Is Having a Mental Breakdown

    09 Aug

    So my friend Chris Huff runs this excellent blog about Church sound (which has replaced “copier repair” as the number one technical frustration of for many church leaders).  Larger worship teams combined with ever-expanding technical options can create more headaches than a Nicholar Cage movie.

    Anyway, he put up a very funny post Top Ten Signs The Sound Guy Is Having a Mental Breakdown, and I recommend it for your viewing pleasure.

     
    1 Comment

    Posted in Church, Humor

     

    If I become an athiest, here is reason number 2

    07 Aug

    Thanks to Mike Mercer for showing me this gem:

     
    6 Comments

    Posted in Church, Humor

     

    If I become an athiest, here’s reason number 1

    04 Aug

    (on the other hand, maybe we just found a new theme song for the upcoming Revelation series!)

     
    4 Comments

    Posted in Church, Humor

     

    A Mass of Catholics

    22 Jul

    One of the great things about the English language is its utter absurdity.  Foreigners trying to learn English can be forgiven for wondering if we made up some rules just to confuse them.  Take collective nouns for animals.  Instead of just calling several members of the same species as a “group” or a “bunch” (like any logical 3-year old would) we insist on calling them a herd of cows, or a litter of puppies, or a troop of monkeys.  More sophisticated speakers will talk of a pod of walrus, a band of gorillas, a string of ponies.  Some collective nouns make no sense at all: a husk of jackrabbits, a knot of toads.  The best ones combine the idea of plurality with some characteristic of the species: A wake of buzzards, a parliament of owls, or (my favorite) a lounge of lizards.

    But why should the animal world have all the fun here?  Could we not also think of some collective nouns for people or groups in the Bible?  Here are a few starters.

    • A pride of Pharisees
    • A sea of Egyptians
    • A lesion of lepers
    • A dirge of prophets
    • A scribbling of scribes
    • A confusion of concubines

    We can do the same thing to today’s religious groups

    • A chorus of charismatics
    • A potluck of Presbyterians
    • A mass of Catholics
    • A back-pew of Baptists
    • A porch-full of Mormons
    • A smashing of Luddites
    • A bank of tele-evangelists
    • A list of legalists

    Or even groups from your own church

    • A hush of ushers
    • A tyranny of toddlers
    • A tangle of teenagers
    • A babel of babies
    • A diarrhea of diapers
    • A caravan of minivans

    Okay, your turn.  How about some suggestions in one of the three categories above.  Remember, they should combine the notion of plurality with some characteristic of the group.  Bonus points if they begin with the same letter.

     
    3 Comments

    Posted in Church, Humor

     
     
    Random thoughts on life, the universe and everything